A Consumer Protection and Employment Law Firm Serving California, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Illinois.

Wise Media sued for spam “Love Genie Tips” text messages

Table Of Contents
Summarize with
ChatGPT Claude Gemini Perplexity Grok

A federal class action lawsuit has been filed against Wise Media, LLC, an alleged spammer that tricks cell phone customers out of $10 a month for “flirting tips” unless they immediately reject a “tip” they never asked for, consented to, or even received.

According to the class action lawsuit, lead Plaintiff Andrew Humble he received a text message from an unknown sender in January 2012 stating: “LoveGenieTips Flirting Tips; 3msg/week for $9.99/m T&Cs: lovegenietips.com Msg & data rates may apply. Reply HELP for help, STOP to cancel. PIN 5WY6.”  Because he did not recognize the number, Humble ignored the text.  Two minutes later, Humble says he received another text that read: “Lovegenietips: You joined $9.99/m for 3msg/wk bill to cell.”  Again, Humble says, he did not respond to the text because he didn’t recognize the number.

“Humble had no intention of enrolling in the subscription plan,” the Wise Media class action lawsuit states. “In support of this lack of any intention to enroll in the subscription plan, Humble relied on the fact that he did not have a relationship with defendant, had not solicited any goods or services from defendant, and had not responded to any of defendant’s texts.”

In February, he received a 3rd text message from Wise Media stating “LoveGenieTips: Subsc renewed 1mo. 3msg/wk for $9.99/mo billed to cell,” and became suspicious and decided to check his bank account and cell phone bill for unauthorized charges. His suspicions were confirmed when he discovered a monthly subscription charge from Wise Media in the amount of $9.99 charged to his account. “Humble never authorized this charge for LoveGenieTips Alerts, which was charged to his cell phone bill the same day and presumably minutes after he received the first SMS text message,” the class action lawsuit states.

Additionally,  “Wise Media’s conduct is particularly egregious because not only did the defendant involuntarily enroll consumers in a fee-based service, the defendant also failed to provide the services it claimed that it was charging consumers for – i.e. the consumers never received the weekly flirting tips.”

“Wise Media obtained cell phone numbers even though consumers had never visited the website, had never expressed interest in defendant or the subscription plan, and had no relationship with the defendant,” the text message spam class action lawsuit states.

“Without any action or solicitation by the consumers, defendant sent SMS texts to the mobile phone numbers that it had acquired… using equipment that had the capacity to store or produce telephone numbers to be called, using a random sequential number generator.”

If these allegations are true, Wise Media would be considered to be in  violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA), as well as fraudulent and unfair business practices, Humble says. He is seeking actual monetary loss or $500 each for each violation of the TCPA, plus restitution, damages and treble damages for a proposed class of all individuals who received unsolicited SMS text messages from or on behalf of Wise Media, and who were charged for a Subscription Plan on their cell phone bills.

If you are receiving unsolicited spam text messages on your cell phone in violation of the TCPA, you may be entitled to compensation.  Please call California Consumer Protection Attorney, Todd M. Friedman at 877-449-8898 for a free consultation.

Quick Navigation

Free Consultation

Undisclosed
Settlement

TCPA class action against the Los Angeles Times. Final approval granted 2014.

More Details
$750,000
Settlement

Common fund class-wide TCPA settlement against home healthcare provider. Final approval granted.

More Details
$27.6M
Settlement

TCPA class action certified on behalf of approximately 2,000,000 class members under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3). Subsequently settled on a Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) basis. Final approval granted.

More Details
$5.2M
Settlement

/

Unruh Act class action on behalf of approximately 240,000 consumers challenging Tinder’s age-based differential pricing for its subscription service. Final approval granted; subsequently went up on appeal.

More Details
$390,000
Settlement

TCPA class action alleging HD Supply sent unauthorized marketing text messages to consumers’ mobile phones without consent between October 21, 2011 and July 26, 2017. Presided over by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Case terminated January 29, 2018.

More Details
$1,500,000
Settlement

/

TCPA class action against a Kansas-based payday lender alleged to have contacted consumers via prerecorded calls on their cell phones to collect alleged debts without consent. California federal judge granted final approval.

More Details
$6,500,000
Settlement

/

Cal. Penal Code § 632.7 class action certified by contested motion under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) on behalf of over 40,000 class members whose calls were recorded without their knowledge or consent. Final approval granted.

More Details
$13,000,000
Settlement

/

$13 Million Class action alleging HSBC recorded consumer telephone calls without knowledge or consent in violation of California’s Privacy Statute (Penal Code § 632.7). California Federal Judge granted final approval.

More Details
$34,000,000
Settlement

/

One of the largest TCPA class action settlements in U.S. history at time of approval. Alleged Chase used an automatic telephone dialing system to contact consumers on their cell phones without prior express consent from July 2008 through December 2013. Settlement class included over 32 million members. Final approval granted March 2016.

More Details
$150,000,000
Settlement

/

Class action on behalf of over 100,000 owners of GM vehicles equipped with allegedly defective LG-manufactured batteries posing fire and safety risks. Litigation commenced December 2020. U.S. District Judge Terrence G. Berg indicated preliminary approval of the $150 million settlement.

More Details
$100,000,000
Settlement

/ /

Landmark gig-economy class action. DoorDash drivers in California and Massachusetts alleged they were wrongly classified as independent contractors rather than employees. Firm served as class counsel. Final approval granted January 13, 2022 — the largest gig-economy worker class settlement in U.S. history at the time.

More Details

Office Locations

Copyright 2025 Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. All Rights Reserved.