A Consumer Protection and Employment Law Firm Serving California, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Illinois.

Los Angeles Lemon Law Attorneys

Table Of Contents
Summarize with
ChatGPT Claude Gemini Perplexity Grok

There is NO UPFRONT COST to contact our firm and pursue a remedy to your situation. We work on a contingency fee basis. Call 323-285-3255.

The Lemon Law

You purchased or leased a new or lightly used vehicle because you wanted something you can count on. If your car has been nothing but a lemon, what can you do? You can turn to the Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman for honest and aggressive representation.

We focus on protecting the rights of consumers in Calabasas and throughout the nation. We have the trial skills and resources to take on powerful opponents and achieve results for our clients. If you have been wronged by a dealer or manufacturer, we can make things right.

Officially known as the Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act, the California Lemon Law protects consumers if a motor vehicle fails to perform as provided under an express warranty. Simply put, if a vehicle is not performing and the situation cannot be remedied in a reasonable number of attempts, the vehicle is considered to be a lemon.

The Lemon Law covers a wide variety of motor vehicles, including cars, trucks, motorcycles, recreational vehicles and boats. Warranty cases can be extremely complex, so it is important to have our experienced lawyer on your side.

There is NO UPFRONT COST to contact our firm and pursue a remedy to your situation. We work on a contingency fee basis. Call 323-285-3255.

Talk directly with an attorney from our firm. We will make sure you understand your rights at every step of your case as we aggressively pursue the outcome you deserve.

Had Enough Of Your Lemon?

Talk directly to an attorney from our firm who will advise you of your rights and pursue them to the fullest extent of the law.

Contact us today for a free consultation with our nationwide lemon law attorney.

Free Consultation

Undisclosed
Settlement

TCPA class action against the Los Angeles Times. Final approval granted 2014.

More Details
$750,000
Settlement

Common fund class-wide TCPA settlement against home healthcare provider. Final approval granted.

More Details
$27.6M
Settlement

TCPA class action certified on behalf of approximately 2,000,000 class members under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3). Subsequently settled on a Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) basis. Final approval granted.

More Details
$5.2M
Settlement

/

Unruh Act class action on behalf of approximately 240,000 consumers challenging Tinder’s age-based differential pricing for its subscription service. Final approval granted; subsequently went up on appeal.

More Details
$390,000
Settlement

TCPA class action alleging HD Supply sent unauthorized marketing text messages to consumers’ mobile phones without consent between October 21, 2011 and July 26, 2017. Presided over by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Case terminated January 29, 2018.

More Details
$1,500,000
Settlement

/

TCPA class action against a Kansas-based payday lender alleged to have contacted consumers via prerecorded calls on their cell phones to collect alleged debts without consent. California federal judge granted final approval.

More Details
$6,500,000
Settlement

/

Cal. Penal Code § 632.7 class action certified by contested motion under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) on behalf of over 40,000 class members whose calls were recorded without their knowledge or consent. Final approval granted.

More Details
$13,000,000
Settlement

/

$13 Million Class action alleging HSBC recorded consumer telephone calls without knowledge or consent in violation of California’s Privacy Statute (Penal Code § 632.7). California Federal Judge granted final approval.

More Details
$34,000,000
Settlement

/

One of the largest TCPA class action settlements in U.S. history at time of approval. Alleged Chase used an automatic telephone dialing system to contact consumers on their cell phones without prior express consent from July 2008 through December 2013. Settlement class included over 32 million members. Final approval granted March 2016.

More Details
$150,000,000
Settlement

/

Class action on behalf of over 100,000 owners of GM vehicles equipped with allegedly defective LG-manufactured batteries posing fire and safety risks. Litigation commenced December 2020. U.S. District Judge Terrence G. Berg indicated preliminary approval of the $150 million settlement.

More Details
$100,000,000
Settlement

/ /

Landmark gig-economy class action. DoorDash drivers in California and Massachusetts alleged they were wrongly classified as independent contractors rather than employees. Firm served as class counsel. Final approval granted January 13, 2022 — the largest gig-economy worker class settlement in U.S. history at the time.

More Details

Office Locations

Copyright 2025 Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. All Rights Reserved.