A Consumer Protection and Employment Law Firm Serving California, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Illinois.

Isip v. Mercedes-Benz USA

323-690-1688

Table Of Contents

Summarize with

Isip v. Mercedes-Benz USA: LA County Superior Court (App. No. B192382)

Trial victory against Mercedes-Benz USA for Lemon Law violations and breach of express and implied warranties under the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act. Firm also successfully defended Mercedes’ subsequent appeal (B192382).

Quick Navigation

Free Consultation

Undisclosed

Verdict

November 2007 jury verdict against Honda for breach of warranty in Orange County Superior Court.

More Details

Undisclosed

Verdict

Lemon Law jury trial verdict against Honda in 2006. Plaintiff prevailed on claims that vehicle failed to conform to warranty after reasonable repair attempts.

More Details

Undisclosed

Verdict

August 4, 2005 jury verdict for breach of warranty under the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act. Firm also successfully defended the appeal in this case.

More Details

Undisclosed

Verdict

More Details

Undisclosed

Settlement

TCPA class action against the Los Angeles Times. Final approval granted 2014.

More Details

Undisclosed

Settlement

TCPA class action against HSBC Bank. Final approval granted.

More Details

$400,000–$750,000

Settlement

Common fund class-wide TCPA settlement against home healthcare provider. Final approval granted.

More Details

Undisclosed

Settlement

CLRA class action certified on behalf of tens of thousands of consumers harmed by HP printer firmware update practices. Final approval granted 2016.

More Details

Undisclosed

Settlement

Class Action

Co-lead class counsel in consolidated Unfair Competition Law class action alleging HP covertly pushed a firmware update that prevented consumers’ printers from accepting third-party ink cartridges. Final approval granted.

More Details

Undisclosed

Settlement

TCPA class action certified on behalf of approximately 2,000,000 class members under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3). Subsequently settled on a Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) basis. Final approval granted.

More Details

Undisclosed

Settlement

FCRA class action for improper credit pulls (unauthorized hard inquiries). Certified under Rule 23 by contested motion and settled on a class-wide basis. Final approval granted.

More Details

Undisclosed

Settlement

Class Action / Consumer Class Action

Unruh Act class action on behalf of approximately 240,000 consumers challenging Tinder’s age-based differential pricing for its subscription service. Final approval granted; subsequently went up on appeal.

More Details

$260,000

Settlement

Class Action / Employment Class Action / Employment Law

Class action settlement resolving claims under various California wage and hour employment laws. California State Judge approved October 1, 2018.

More Details

$390,000

Settlement

PAGA settlement in wage and hour action on behalf of employees. Settlement approval granted.

More Details

$390,000

Settlement

TCPA class action alleging HD Supply sent unauthorized marketing text messages to consumers’ mobile phones without consent between October 21, 2011 and July 26, 2017. Presided over by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Case terminated January 29, 2018.

More Details

$1,500,000

Settlement

Class Action / Consumer Class Action

TCPA class action against a Kansas-based payday lender alleged to have contacted consumers via prerecorded calls on their cell phones to collect alleged debts without consent. California federal judge granted final approval.

More Details

$2,400,000

Settlement

Class Action / Employment Class Action / Employment Law

Class-wide settlement in wage and hour independent contractor misclassification class action on behalf of approximately 1,800 valet employees. Final approval granted.

More Details

$2,500,000

Settlement

Class Action / Employment Class Action / Employment Law

Wage and hour class action for independent contractor misclassification on behalf of 230 employees. Final approval granted.

More Details

$6,500,000

Settlement

Class Action / Consumer Class Action

Cal. Penal Code § 632.7 class action certified by contested motion under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) on behalf of over 40,000 class members whose calls were recorded without their knowledge or consent. Final approval granted.

More Details