A Consumer Protection and Employment Law Firm Serving California, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Illinois.

Robocall Harassment

323-690-1688

Table Of Contents

Summarize with

ChatGPT

Claude

Gemini

Perplexity

Grok

Consumers Are Protected From Robocalls

Few telemarketing calls are more annoying than robocalls, which use a computerized autodialer to deliver a prerecorded message. These calls may also be illegal.

If you are receiving robocalls from a telemarketer, the Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman in Calabasas can help. Not only can we stop the calls, but we may also be able to obtain compensation for you from the telemarketer. Call to discuss your case with one of our attorneys. We serve consumers in Los Angeles and throughout the nation.

When Are Robocalls Illegal?

Robocalls are regulated both under California law and a federal law known as the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.

The following telemarketer actions are illegal under federal law:

Solicitations to residences using an artificial voice or a recording
Calling a cellphone using automated telephone equipment or an artificial or prerecorded voice
Failing to maintain a “do-not-call” list of consumers who ask not to be called
Failing to honor the National Do Not Call Registry

California bans robocalls unless there is an existing relationship between you and the caller. The following regulations apply:

A person must come on the line before the artificial or prerecorded voice to identify the nature of the call and the organization.
You must consent to the recording being played.
The robocaller must disconnect as soon as the prerecorded message is over or you hang up.

If the organization making the prerecorded call violated state or federal law, our lawyers can file a lawsuit and seek compensation on your behalf. Our fees will be paid by the organization making the calls.

If you’re not sure you have a case, talk with our lawyers. At the Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C., you will speak
directly with an attorney from our firm. We will provide you with timely case analysis and a smart strategy. This direct attorney contact saves our clients time and minimizes stress and uncertainty.

Contact Our Attorneys For Robocall Harassment Help Nationwide

For a free case evaluation, call or complete our simple contact form.

Quick Navigation

Free Consultation

Undisclosed

Settlement

TCPA class action against the Los Angeles Times. Final approval granted 2014.

$2.4M

Settlement

Class Action / Consumer Class Action

TCPA class action against HSBC Bank. Final approval granted.

$750,000

Settlement

Class Action

Common fund class-wide TCPA settlement against home healthcare provider. Final approval granted.

$900,000+

Settlement

Class Action / Consumer Class Action

CLRA class action certified on behalf of tens of thousands of consumers harmed by HP printer firmware update practices. Final approval granted 2016.

$27.6M

Settlement

Class Action

TCPA class action certified on behalf of approximately 2,000,000 class members under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3). Subsequently settled on a Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) basis. Final approval granted.

Verdict

$5.2M

Settlement

Class Action / Consumer Class Action

Unruh Act class action on behalf of approximately 240,000 consumers challenging Tinder’s age-based differential pricing for its subscription service. Final approval granted; subsequently went up on appeal.

$260,000

Settlement

Class Action / Employment Class Action / Employment Law

Class action settlement resolving claims under various California wage and hour employment laws. California State Judge approved October 1, 2018.

$390,000

Settlement

Employment Class Action / Employment Law

PAGA settlement in wage and hour action on behalf of employees. Settlement approval granted.

$390,000

Settlement

Class Action

TCPA class action alleging HD Supply sent unauthorized marketing text messages to consumers’ mobile phones without consent between October 21, 2011 and July 26, 2017. Presided over by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Case terminated January 29, 2018.

$1,500,000

Settlement

Class Action / Consumer Class Action

TCPA class action against a Kansas-based payday lender alleged to have contacted consumers via prerecorded calls on their cell phones to collect alleged debts without consent. California federal judge granted final approval.

$2,400,000

Settlement

Class Action / Employment Class Action / Employment Law

Class-wide settlement in wage and hour independent contractor misclassification class action on behalf of approximately 1,800 valet employees. Final approval granted.

$2,500,000

Settlement

Class Action / Employment Class Action / Employment Law

Wage and hour class action for independent contractor misclassification on behalf of 230 employees. Final approval granted.

$6,500,000

Settlement

Class Action / Consumer Class Action

Cal. Penal Code § 632.7 class action certified by contested motion under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) on behalf of over 40,000 class members whose calls were recorded without their knowledge or consent. Final approval granted.

$13,000,000

Settlement

Class Action / Consumer Class Action

$13 Million Class action alleging HSBC recorded consumer telephone calls without knowledge or consent in violation of California’s Privacy Statute (Penal Code § 632.7). California Federal Judge granted final approval.

$34,000,000

Settlement

Class Action / Consumer Class Action

One of the largest TCPA class action settlements in U.S. history at time of approval. Alleged Chase used an automatic telephone dialing system to contact consumers on their cell phones without prior express consent from July 2008 through December 2013. Settlement class included over 32 million members. Final approval granted March 2016.

$150,000,000

Settlement

Class Action / Consumer Class Action

Class action on behalf of over 100,000 owners of GM vehicles equipped with allegedly defective LG-manufactured batteries posing fire and safety risks. Litigation commenced December 2020. U.S. District Judge Terrence G. Berg indicated preliminary approval of the $150 million settlement.

$100,000,000

Settlement

Class Action / Employment Class Action / Employment Law

Landmark gig-economy class action. DoorDash drivers in California and Massachusetts alleged they were wrongly classified as independent contractors rather than employees. Firm served as class counsel. Final approval granted January 13, 2022 — the largest gig-economy worker class settlement in U.S. history at the time.

$650,000

Settlement

Employment Law / Result

Settlement of $650,000 for sexual harassment and hostile work environment.

$750,000

Settlement

Employment Law / Result

Settlement of $750,000 for pregnancy discrimination.

Office Locations

Los Angeles

Illinois

King of Prussia

Ohio

Free
Consultation

323-973-2580

Copyright 2025 Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. All Rights Reserved.

Privacy Policy Disclaimer T&Cs Opt-Out Sitemap