A Consumer Protection and Employment Law Firm Serving California, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Illinois.

Telemarketer Harassment

Table Of Contents
Summarize with
ChatGPT Claude Gemini Perplexity Grok

Protecting Your Peace Of Mind

There is a way to fight back against telemarketers who continue to call after you tell them to stop. Our lawyers can stop the calls and in many cases obtain compensation for you from the telemarketer.

At the Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman in Calabasas, our nationwide consumer protection lawyers are here to stop telemarketer harassment. Call to discuss your case with one of our attorneys. There is no charge for the consultation. If we take your case and are successful, our fees will be paid by the telemarketer. We serve consumers throughout the nation.

Telemarketers continue to call consumers for one reason: because it pays. Our goal is to make the telemarketer pay when it does so illegally.

Specific telemarketer actions are prohibited by the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. Examples include:

  • Calling you before 8 a.m. or after 9 p.m.
  • Failing to maintain a “do-not-call” list of consumers who ask not to be called
  • Failing to honor the National Do Not Call Registry
  • Robocalling you

If the telemarketer who has been calling you violated the law, our attorneys can file a lawsuit against the telemarketer. If we win, you can collect damages of up to $1,500 for each violation (or actual damages if greater).

Put A Stop To Unwanted Phone Calls From Telemarketers

For a free case evaluation, call our nationwide telemarketer harassment lawyers at or complete our simple contact form. At the Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C., you will work directly with your attorney. We will save you time with timely case analysis.

Quick Navigation

Free Consultation

Undisclosed
Settlement

TCPA class action against the Los Angeles Times. Final approval granted 2014.

More Details
$750,000
Settlement

Common fund class-wide TCPA settlement against home healthcare provider. Final approval granted.

More Details
$27.6M
Settlement

TCPA class action certified on behalf of approximately 2,000,000 class members under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3). Subsequently settled on a Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) basis. Final approval granted.

More Details
$5.2M
Settlement

/

Unruh Act class action on behalf of approximately 240,000 consumers challenging Tinder’s age-based differential pricing for its subscription service. Final approval granted; subsequently went up on appeal.

More Details
$390,000
Settlement

TCPA class action alleging HD Supply sent unauthorized marketing text messages to consumers’ mobile phones without consent between October 21, 2011 and July 26, 2017. Presided over by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Case terminated January 29, 2018.

More Details
$1,500,000
Settlement

/

TCPA class action against a Kansas-based payday lender alleged to have contacted consumers via prerecorded calls on their cell phones to collect alleged debts without consent. California federal judge granted final approval.

More Details
$6,500,000
Settlement

/

Cal. Penal Code § 632.7 class action certified by contested motion under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) on behalf of over 40,000 class members whose calls were recorded without their knowledge or consent. Final approval granted.

More Details
$13,000,000
Settlement

/

$13 Million Class action alleging HSBC recorded consumer telephone calls without knowledge or consent in violation of California’s Privacy Statute (Penal Code § 632.7). California Federal Judge granted final approval.

More Details
$34,000,000
Settlement

/

One of the largest TCPA class action settlements in U.S. history at time of approval. Alleged Chase used an automatic telephone dialing system to contact consumers on their cell phones without prior express consent from July 2008 through December 2013. Settlement class included over 32 million members. Final approval granted March 2016.

More Details
$150,000,000
Settlement

/

Class action on behalf of over 100,000 owners of GM vehicles equipped with allegedly defective LG-manufactured batteries posing fire and safety risks. Litigation commenced December 2020. U.S. District Judge Terrence G. Berg indicated preliminary approval of the $150 million settlement.

More Details
$100,000,000
Settlement

/ /

Landmark gig-economy class action. DoorDash drivers in California and Massachusetts alleged they were wrongly classified as independent contractors rather than employees. Firm served as class counsel. Final approval granted January 13, 2022 — the largest gig-economy worker class settlement in U.S. history at the time.

More Details

Office Locations

Copyright 2025 Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. All Rights Reserved.